Generate AI videos

POST /api/v1/creative-hub/generate/video accepts luma_ray3 / runway_gen4. Broader catalog (kling_2_6/3_0, veo_3_1, seedance_pro) lives in the studio suite. Async, mp4 output in Drive.

Written By Salvatore Sinigaglia

Last updated About 4 hours ago

POST /api/v1/creative-hub/generate/video accepts luma_ray3 / runway_gen4. Broader catalog (kling_2_6/3_0, veo_3_1, seedance_pro) lives in the studio suite. Async, mp4 output in Drive.

Generate AI videos

POST /api/v1/creative-hub/generate/video (verified apps/backend/src/routes/api/creative-hub-generate.route.ts). This legacy route accepts two providers: luma_ray3 (cinematic motion) and runway_gen4 (text-to-video + image-to-video). The broader video catalog in apps/backend/src/providers/creative/types.ts — kling_2_6, kling_3_0 (strong physics), veo_3_1 (Google, high quality), seedance_pro — is exposed through the newer studio suite (see ch-101). Params: prompt, provider, aspect_ratio, drive_folder_id. Async via generate-video.worker.ts; output mp4 stored in your Drive folder.

Who is this for

Mediabuyers needing short-form video for Reels / TikTok / Stories / in-stream. UGC alternatives without filming.

Providers

On the /generate/video route you can pick luma_ray3 or runway_gen4. The models below (kling_2_6, kling_3_0, veo_3_1, seedance_pro) are part of the broader catalog exposed through the studio suite, not this route.

luma_ray3

Best for: cinematic motion, dramatic camera movements, dreamy / atmospheric scenes.

Strengths: smooth motion, cinematic look. Weaknesses: less suited for fast cuts.

runway_gen4

Best for: text-to-video starting points + image-to-video animation of existing assets.

Strengths: most flexible input (text OR image), good general-purpose quality. Weaknesses: occasional motion artifacts.

kling_2_6

Best for: physics-heavy scenes (water, fabric, fire), realistic body motion.

Strengths: strong physics simulation. Weaknesses: less stylized control.

kling_3_0

Newer Kling model. Generally improved over 2_6 with better motion coherence + longer durations supported.

veo_3_1

Best for: highest quality output, complex scenes, professional ad polish.

Strengths: Google's premium model — best quality. Weaknesses: most expensive.

How to generate

Step 1: Open the generator

/creative-hub → AI Generate → Video tab.

Step 2: Pick a provider

On this route: luma_ray3 or runway_gen4. (The studio suite exposes the fuller catalog.)

Step 3: Pick input mode

  • Text-to-video: prompt only
  • Image-to-video: upload / select an image + prompt to describe animation

For consistent product / brand: image-to-video keeps your reference image as the starting frame.

Step 4: Write the prompt

Specify:

  • Subject + action ("A coffee cup being filled with steaming coffee")
  • Camera movement ("slow zoom in", "pan from left to right")
  • Style ("cinematic", "vlog handheld", "studio")
  • Setting / mood

Step 5: Set duration

Typically 4-10 seconds per generation. Longer = costlier + slower. Most ad placements: 5-6 sec ideal.

Step 6: Set aspect_ratio

  • 9:16 for Reels / Stories / TikTok
  • 1:1 for feed
  • 16:9 for in-stream / YouTube

Step 7: Submit

Click Generate. Returns 202 Accepted + job_id.

Step 8: Track + download

Jobs panel shows progress. Video generation is slower than image: 1-5 min typical depending on provider + duration.

Once completed: download mp4 or use directly in Campaign Creator (see ch-106).

Endpoint

POST /api/v1/creative-hub/generate/video (verified).

Body:

  • prompt (required, 1-2000 chars)
  • provider (optional, luma_ray3 | runway_gen4)
  • image_url (optional, image-to-video)
  • duration (optional, 2-10 seconds)
  • aspect_ratio (optional, 16:9 | 9:16 | 1:1)
  • drive_folder_id (optional)

Returns:

  • 202 Accepted + {job_id, status: "pending"}

Worker writes result_urls (single mp4) + cost_cents on completion. Poll GET /api/v1/creative-hub/generate/jobs/:id.

Cost

Higher than image generation. Cost scales with: provider tier (veo_3_1 most expensive), duration, resolution.

Failed jobs free. See ch-112.

Provider selection guide

Use casePick
Product hero / cinematic launchveo_3_1 (premium) or luma_ray3
Vlog / casual UGC viberunway_gen4
Animate an existing product photorunway_gen4 (image-to-video)
Physics-heavy (fluid, fabric)kling_2_6 or kling_3_0
First exploration / budget-consciousrunway_gen4 typically

Prompt patterns that work

Anchor with subject + setting

"A {subject} in {setting}, {action}, {camera movement}, {mood}"

Example: "A jogger on a misty mountain trail, running uphill, slow tracking shot from behind, golden hour light, inspirational mood."

Specify motion vs static

If the AI generates a near-static frame: explicitly say "dynamic camera movement, subject in motion".

Match the placement format

For 9:16 Reels: prompts that work in vertical framing. Mention "vertical composition" if needed.

Best practices

Generate target duration directly

Don't generate 10s + trim to 6s. Generate 6s — cheaper + better composition.

Plan around generation latency

Video generation takes 1-5 min per attempt. Don't wait between iterations — submit 3 prompt variants, work on something else, come back when done.

Use image-to-video for product consistency

Brand product shot → image-to-video → consistent product on every variant. Reduces re-generation due to product inaccuracies.

Pair with TTS + compositing

Video alone is silent; TTS narration (ch-116) + compositing (ch-117) gives final ad-ready output.

Common mistakes

  • Generating 10s when ad is 6s: wasted credits + worse pacing
  • Wrong aspect_ratio for placement: 16:9 video on 9:16 Reels = letterboxed; doesn't perform
  • Single variant of expensive provider: generate 3 cheap then 1 of veo_3_1 for the winner concept
  • Skipping image-to-video for product ads: text-to-video may misrepresent your product; image-to-video locks it

Common issues

  • Motion artifacts (warping, weird limbs): typical for difficult scenes (multiple people, complex hand motion); try different provider or simplify prompt
  • Provider rejected prompt: content moderation. Reword.
  • Generation timed out (> 10 min): rare; check job error_message; usually re-submit succeeds
  • Output silent: expected — video providers don't generate audio. Pair with TTS via compositing.

FAQ

Which video provider should I choose in Wevion?

On the /generate/video route you choose between luma_ray3 (cinematic motion) and runway_gen4 (the most flexible, with both text-to-video and image-to-video). The broader video catalog — kling_2_6 and kling_3_0 (physics-heavy scenes like water and fabric), veo_3_1 (Google's premium, highest quality), and seedance_pro — is available through the newer studio suite rather than this route.

What is the difference between text-to-video and image-to-video?

Text-to-video generates a clip from a prompt alone, while image-to-video starts from an image you upload or select plus a prompt describing the animation. In Wevion, image-to-video keeps your reference image as the starting frame, which is the recommended choice for product ads because it locks the product's appearance and avoids misrepresentation across variants.

Do AI-generated videos include sound?

No. Video providers in Wevion generate silent output, which is expected behavior. To add audio, pair the video with text-to-speech narration and combine them using video compositing. This lets you produce a finished, ad-ready clip with voiceover from otherwise silent generated footage.

How long can generated videos be and how long does generation take?

Each generation is typically 4-10 seconds, and most ad placements work best at 5-6 seconds, since longer durations cost more and run slower. Generate your target length directly rather than trimming later. Video generation is slower than image generation, usually taking 1-5 minutes depending on the provider and duration, so submit several variants and return when they finish.